[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
[science-iwg] Fwd: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs
 | 
  
  
    As part of the Autumn release, if Triquetrum is to be included, we
    need to close open Triquetrum CQs. 
     
    As part of this, we need to list what projects are planning to
    participate in the release. 
     
    Shall I set up a wiki for the Autumn release where we can list which
    projects are intending to release? 
     
    BTW - about the name, I prefer Autumn over Fall because Autumn is
    more positive than Fall.  So, unless someone objects, can we go with
    Science Autumn 2016 Release? 
     
    _Christopher 
    
      
      -------- Forwarded Message --------
      
      
       
      
      Hi Christopher.
       
      Projects can do releases while in incubation.
       
      All CQs for code/libraries that are included in the release bits
      must be closed/approved by the IP Team prior to the release.
       
      In the time leading up to the release, you can and should
      distribute milestone builds that includes code/libraries that the
      IP team has granted checkin approval for. These are not official
      releases, and should be annotated as such (e.g. 0.7M2).
       
      I recommend that the Science Working Group make a master list of
      all the open CQs that are required for the coordinated autumn
      release that we can present to the IP Team along with your last
      question. This should be a relatively easy query if we have a list
      of participating projects. Giving the IP Team a clear picture of
      what needs to be accomplished is the best way of getting that
      question answered.
       
      By way of background for those readers who are not involved in the
      Science Working Group's communications: several of the Science
      projects have decided to do a coordinated release in the fall
      (along the lines of what the Planning Council does with the
      Simultaneous Release)
       
      HTH,
       
      Wayne
      
       On 21/03/16 07:04 PM, Christopher
        Brooks wrote: 
       
      
        
        Triquetrum is using the Parallel IP Process.   
         
        We have open CQs for third party material: 
         
        
          
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439
          - diva 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10440
          - ptolemy.actor.gui 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10441
          - ptolemy.actor.lib 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10442
          - ptolemy.core 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10443
          - ptolemy.sdf 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10444
          - ptolemy.gui 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10445
          - ptolemy.moml 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10446
          - org.ptolemy.commons 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856
          - ptolemy.domains.process 
         
        We would like to participate in the Science/Industry Working
        Group Autumn 2016 release, which is scheduled for October 21,
        2016. 
         
        Can do an interim release with open CQs while remaining in
        incubation?  
         
        https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase
        says: 
         
        
          
           Interim Releases. Incubation Phase projects may
            make releases. All major and minor releases must go through
            a Release
              Review. 
         
        https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews
        says: 
         
        
          
          Intellectual
              Property
          Before you can consider a Release Review, all of the
            relevant CQs must be approved by the Eclipse Legal team. We
            cannot schedule a Review before the Legal team has completed
            their work. If you are waiting for CQs, please review where
            your CQs are, and when they are scheduled to be reviewed, in
            the IP
              team work queue.  
         
         
        The above indicates to me that we need to have the CQs approved
        before release review.  Does approved mean closed? 
         
        If we need to have these CQs closed, is it feasible to have them
        closed by the end of September so that we can schedule a release
        review?   
         
        Thanks, 
         
        _Christopher 
         
        -- 
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm               Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 707.332.0670           (Office: 545Q Cory) 
         
        
         
        _______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
 
       
      
      --  
        Wayne Beaton 
        @waynebeaton 
        The Eclipse Foundation
             
      
     
     
  
 | 
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation