You can also have a look at OrientDB. It's quite nice, cause it can
    be easily used in embedded modus: 
    http://orientdb.com/docs/2.0/orientdb.wiki/Object-Database.html 
     
    Moreover, my CQ has been accepted to bring the OrientDB library to
    Eclipse Orbit. We just have to resolve some minor issues at the
    Orbit Bundle Recipes project. 
     
     
    Best, 
    Philip 
     
    Am 04.02.2016 um 13:32 schrieb Jay Jay
      Billings: 
     
    
      The first implementation of ICE's
        IPersistenceProvider service was JPA based and we used
        EclipseLink. 
      In my opinion, it was the worst way we could do
        persistence. Maybe we used it wrong, but it was slow,
        cumbersome, constantly breaking and we were genuinely lucky to
        get it both working and get the rest of ICE running in an OSGi
        environment. Almost nothing about it worked as written and most
        of the time the target platform wouldn't even resolve it
        correctly in development. That was about three years ago, so
        maybe it is all fixed now. 
      It was so bad in the end that I deleted it completely
        and took a week to reimplement our IPersistenceProvider service
        in XML using JAXB (and not the JAXB implementation from
        EclipseLink!). The result was a really sweet, robust system that
        almost never breaks. We've barely touched it in three years and
        it was ten times faster for our application. It is a poor man's
        database for sure, but we have no complaints. 
      So, I recommend you think about it long and hard and
        do many tests before committing to JPA and EclipseLink. 
      My apologies to Doug if this comes off as offensive.
        I'm sure EclipseLink works for some folks, it just didn't for
        us. 
      Jay 
      On Feb 4, 2016 5:59 AM, "Mike
        Milinkovich" < mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        wrote:
         
          
             
              Adding Doug Clarke (EclipseLink Project Leader) to this,
              as he would be the guy who actually knows what's going on. 
               
              Doug - What is the state of EclipseLink being available as
              an OSGi bundle? (I think you'll have to subscribe to the
              list to reply) 
               
               
              On 04/02/2016 2:46 AM, Erwin de Ley wrote: 
             
            Dear all,  
               
              Triquetrum's goal is to be an open and extensible platform
              itself, but also to be able to deliver plugins that can
              easily be integrated in other such platforms.  
              And the typical shape will be an RCP application I guess.
               
              (we'll also deliver headless components, but this is even
              irrelevant for the issue described)  
               
              At some point in the near future, we'll start integrating
              a persistence service, preferably based on JPA.  
              We will need to be able to provide & register entity
              implementations from our bundles, while also allowing
              other bundles to do the same.  
              And without blocking the possibility that they should
              belong to the same persistence unit.  
              (e.g. cases where extensions provide entity subclasses
              that must fit in one of the normal mapping strategies, or
              where there are associations mapped to foreign keys etc)  
               
              But there seem to be some issues with the current
              state-of-affairs to use a JPA implementation in an
              OSGi/RCP setup, in a modular way.  
              I.e. it is required that there is
              one-persistence-bundle-to-rule-them-all that registers all
              entities in one shot.  
              This of course does not fit our needs (as also for many
              other modular systems, for which OSGi is meant)  
               
              Furthermore it even seems that eclipselink, since some
              time, no longer targets an OSGi runtime, and that their
              support for this has been moved to Gemini JPA.  
              But Gemini JPA seems quite dead : a milestone that remains
              unfinished since a couple of years.  
               
              Does anyone have any experience in this? There are several
              old-and-more-recent forum posts and bugzilla tickets open
              in this domain, but there seems to be no
              evolution/solution in the 2 mentioned eclipse projects. Is
              there some effort/stretegy on some eclipse foundation PMC
              level or so, to determine what the strategy is related to
              JPA/OSGi/eclipse/modularity?  
               
              thanks  
              erwin  
               
              _______________________________________________  
              science-iwg mailing list  
              science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
               
              To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
              or unsubscribe from this list, visit  
              https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
               
             
            
            
            
           
           
          _______________________________________________ 
          science-iwg mailing list 
          science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx 
          To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
          unsubscribe from this list, visit 
          https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg 
         
       
       
      
       
      _______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg 
     
     
    -- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OpenChrom - the open source alternative for chromatography / mass spectrometry
Dr. Philip Wenig » Founder » philip.wenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx » http://www.openchrom.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
  
 |