Re: [science-iwg] Gap analysis of JAI and ImageJ?

[Christopher Brooks <cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have no formal gap analysis, but below are some data points:

JAI seems stagnant, it was moved over to java.net, but I have not seen much activity.

ImageJ is active.

Ptolemy has JAI actors: http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptolemyII/ptII10.0/ptII/doc/codeDoc/ptolemy/actor/lib/jai/package-summary.html

Kepler has ImageJ actors.

Recently, we started looking at an image processing library: http://www.jhlabs.com/ip/

One issue is that JAI did not have obvious support for blurring or motion capture.

_Christopher

On 7/25/15 4:14 PM, Jay Jay Billings wrote:

Has anyone ever performed a gap analysis of the Java Advanced Imaging library (JAI) and ImageJ?

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javaee/jai-142803.html
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/

Jay

--

Jay Jay Billings

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

-- 
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm               Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 707.332.0670           (Office: 545Q Cory)