[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Ed Burnette wrote:
I still like Wikimedia over Xwiki but that's just my opinion.
ok! But that'd be worth comparing XWiki and Wikimedia roadmaps to see
where we might be one year ahead from now!
In the frame of Phoenix possible usage, this link about wiki engines
comparison might be relevant (both MediaWiki and XWiki are present):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software
BTW, there's also an Eclipse plug-in for Wikimedia:
http://www.plog4u.org/index.php/Main_Page
and one for Confluence:
http://blogs.atlassian.com/rebelutionary/archives/000410.html
and one that supports a few other wikis:
http://eclipsewiki.sourceforge.net/
though none of these are WYSIWYG, if that's important for you. After
using MS Word and various other tools (editme.com, htmlarea, etc.)
for WYSIWYG html editing, I'm sticking with plain text for now.
However, this looks nice, at least on paper:
http://vex.sourceforge.net/
Vex looks very promising indeed, thanks for the link!
There's no rich editor for XWiki yet, but there's this online DHTML
editor available: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Dev/DHTMLWysiwyg
Stéphane
--
Stéphane Laurière
slauriere@xxxxxxxxxxxx