Re: [paho-dev] Porting Paho on MicroEJ Technology

[Stanislas Kobak <skobak@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ian,

Thank you for your quick reply.


1) No because our API is less constrained than J2ME, we can use more
J2SE functionalities.

2) I don't need to change the API except Logger which use
java.util.ResourceBundle. Would it be possible to create a super
interface of Logger which don't use java.util.ResourceBundle ?


Stan


Le 21/01/2015 11:55, Ian Craggs a écrit :
> Hi Stanislas,
> 
> that sounds great!
> 
> 1) Is the existing J2ME client code any good to you?
> 
> 2) As you propose changes, it may be worth considering whether a
> separate codebase is justified.  Any API changes to the existing
> codebase should be backward compatible.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> On 01/21/2015 10:12 AM, Stanislas Kobak wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My name is Stanislas Kobak and I'm a developer for IS2T company. My goal
>> is to port the Java client on our technology called MicroEJ. It is
>> derived from the J2ME profile. Some features such as SSL or File are
>> optional and so I'll need to redesign the client.
>>
>> I would like to share the maximum of code between J2SE, J2ME and others
>> without overriding classes in subproject.
>>
>> I will propose some patches. I would be grateful I you could help me to
>> do these modifications. I will come back to you if I have any question.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stanislas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> paho-dev mailing list
>> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
>