Re: [paho-dev] Future Requirements and Releases of Paho

[Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
some ideas:

- maybe some MQTT test suite for testing client/broker compatibility
- an out of the box client for some hardware plaforms like arduino, mbed
  with TLS security :)

I think the MQTT embedded security story could be greatly improved :)


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:56:50AM -0700, Ian Craggs wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I'm wondering what the future of Paho should look like.  From two points 
> of view: functionality and participation in the wider Eclipse community.
> 
> The reason is that barring a few relatively minor enhancements 
> (automatic reconnect, publishing when not connected, persistence), I 
> don't see that the existing client libraries (Java, Javascript, C, 
> Python) need a lot of new work, and could stabilize within the near future.
> 
> There may be new components - client libraries in different languages, 
> or a different style of library for a different purpose (like the 
> embedded C/C++ APIs I'm working on at the moment).
> 
> So the first question:  are there Paho features, additional to the 
> current libraries, or new components, that would be useful to the 
> Eclipse IoT community?
> 
> The second question is about participation in Mars and future 
> simultaneous releases.  If the Paho components were stable but still 
> useful, how would Paho participate in a simultaneous release?
> 
> -- 
> Ian Craggs
> icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx                 IBM United Kingdom
> Committer on Paho, Mosquitto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> paho-dev mailing list
> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev