Re: [paho-dev] Contribution of MQTT Servers (Mosquitto and RSMB)

["Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roger, Ian,

I suggest that you create a draft proposal for the Eclipse Mosquitto
project, and just leave blank the section on where this will fit within the
Eclipse project "org chart". Whether it is a sub-project of Paho or a peer
of it is something we only need to finalize by the Creation Review. It
doesn't even need to be nailed down completely to post the project.

Of course, if anyone actually feels really strongly about this
organizational stuff, please speak up. I can say in all honesty that it
makes very little difference once the project is actually up and running.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Roger Light
> Sent: June-24-13 12:31 PM
> To: General development discussions for paho project
> Subject: Re: [paho-dev] Contribution of MQTT Servers (Mosquitto and RSMB)
> 
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Mike Milinkovich
> <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 24/06/2013 9:07 AM, Ian Craggs wrote:
> >
> > I thought that Roger had indicated that some other location had been
> > discussed for Mosquitto
> >
> >
> > Roger - Can you remind me what was discussed? Another alternative is
> > to make Mosquitto a peer to Paho, under the still-being-discussed M2M
> > top level project. To be honest, there is almost no difference between
> > those two options from the perspective of the Eclipse Development
Process.
> 
> It was basically along the lines of inside or outside of Paho, and if in
Paho then
> how it would appear (separate component, sub project - is there any
difference
> between these or just different names for the same thing?) as you said.
> 
> > Top-level projects are intended to group communities of interest, and
> > there is no need to be pedantic about their scope.
> 
> I had kind of assumed this, but it's nice to have it confirmed.
> 
> > I am assuming that you have no desire to take Mosquitto to the
> > EclipseRT. If my assumption is incorrect, please chime in!
> 
> I had wondered before if it should be part of the RT project, but that was
based
> on a flawed understanding of its scope.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Roger
> _______________________________________________
> paho-dev mailing list
> paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev