[
Date Prev][Date Next][
Thread Prev][Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [open-regulatory-compliance] Open Source Software Stewards and CRA Whitepaper: review in progress until November 20th
|
On 11/10/2025 1:54 AM, Dirk-Willem van
Gulik via open-regulatory-compliance wrote:
<stuff deleted>
We’re working on the attestations
to figure them out, but they
*MAY* be a way to simplify the manufacturer’s due
diligence. A steward may also have a process
to be more clear about lifecycle events for an open
source project.
Well, they should. Otherwise they wouldn't be much of a
steward?
All one has to do to find existing problems with
'non-profit/profit/Foundation as open source steward' approach is
to look at an existing org-hosted project's dependencies. There
are *many* large popular open source projects where plenty of
resources, time, money, managers, lawyers, insurance, other
'middle-men' exist (and are often well-payed) to keep that
project secure...e.g. all of the Foundation's 'flagship'
projects/applications.
But look 1-level or more down in the project dependency tree
(e.g. modules/libs that are used, or libs that those libs use,
etc.) and the situation changes completely. Historically, many
(if not most) of the major security issues in open source end up
being underneath the top level projects...in the middle and lower
layers of the technology 'stack'. Examples: log4 (a widely-used
logging library, heartbleed (openssl), middleware,
operating-system or even hardware issues. The current situation
is that these lib/infra projects do not get support necessary to
even continue in many cases...and asking them to add maintenance
work through frequently unsupported 'contributions' is just
impossible.
Further, it's not reasonable to expect that just anyone (even in
the dev community specifically) will be able to actually provide
reasonable 'stewardship' for n-level dependencies...no matter what
is said in the marketplace. IMO, there needs to be some
requirements put on 'stewards' that recognizes and addresses this
problem wrt dependencies...as such dependencies are a part of what
defines open source 'community', 'transparency', as well as
'collaboration'.
_______________________________________________
open-regulatory-compliance mailing list
open-regulatory-compliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://accounts.eclipse.org