Just looking at the copyright statement, looks like the author may be a member of the CRA Expert Group – very encouraging to see someone in that position out and working on implementation guidance / toolkits.
From: open-regulatory-compliance <open-regulatory-compliance-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of August Bournique via open-regulatory-compliance
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 5:09 AM
To: Open Regulatory Compliance Working Group <open-regulatory-compliance@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: August Bournique <august@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [open-regulatory-compliance] The attempt of making simplified CC guide for the CRA Default category
It's interesting for sure. I think it might be missing a few things (or I missed them) such as a discussion of support period requirements, and I couldn't find anything regarding the ability to transfer risk
through documentation, something that has come up quite a bit in the vertical standardization efforts.
It's also unclear to me if general products will need to go to this level of documentation, but it's a very neat project.
- August
I'm not sure how many of you have seen this work
https://github.com/sCC4CRA/, but this is a brave and nice attempt to flush out a guide for Module A (self-assessment) for Default category PDEs, by making it "the most looking-like" EUCC. I don't necessarily agree with the "certification" anchor and terms,
but I think we may want to discuss it at the next ORC meeting to get some learnings, at minimum, as we work on our Whitepapers.
_______________________________________________
open-regulatory-compliance mailing list
open-regulatory-compliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://accounts.eclipse.org
|
