[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [oniro-pmc] Oniro v2,.0 release: relevant question
|
At some point, Jun time frame, we thought we'd release binary OS images and related packages updates feeds as a mean to stress /prove our hawkbit integration.
I don't think we're there, any longer - and considering the emphasis on an early release rather than a overly feature rich release - I would feel comfortable in releasing goofy as a source only product and leverage the released source base code for further investigation of the binary OS images release process.
My 2 cents.
Cheers
D
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: mercoledì 12 ottobre 2022 15:01
To: agustin.benito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxx; Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria.ext@xxxxxxxxxx>; Davide Ricci <davide.ricci@xxxxxxxxxx>; amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oniro-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; alberto@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Oniro v2,.0 release: relevant question
Hello,
I have understood as well that this is something we are aiming for in this release. I'm adding Davide and an extra email for Amit that might give us a better understanding of the reasoning and plans on this topic for 2.0.
Andrei Gherzan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Agustin Benito Bethencourt [mailto:agustin.benito@eclipse-
> foundation.org]
> Sent: 11 October 2022 12:00
> To: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxx; Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria.ext@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: oniro-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; alberto@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Oniro v2,.0 release: relevant question
>
> Hello Amit and Andrei,
>
> since the beginning of the project onboarding into Eclipse Foundation,
> we have been working on the basis that we would not release any image
> (binaries) on our first "release under EF".
>
> There are several reasons for that, being the need to distribute
> non-OSI approved licensed code and even proprietary code without EF
> having any kind of legal relation with the copyright/patent holders,
> one of the major concerns that led us to put such constrain. The idea
> was to work on that direction for a second release.
>
> The Oniro Platform Release Roadmap update presented to the PMC and the
> Oniro WG SC some days ago does not state any news on this front. No
> conversation in any public Oniro channel takes me to think that this
> assumption has been challenged.
>
> Still, I keep hearing that there are plans to release images for Oniro
> as part of the Oniro v2.0
>
> Can you clarify to me this point, please?
>
> Best Regards
>
> --
> Agustin Benito Bethencourt
> Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation
> Eclipse Foundation: The Community for Open Innovation and
> Collaboration
>