Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [oniro-pmc] Oniro v2,.0 release: relevant question

At some point, Jun time frame, we thought we'd release binary OS images and related packages updates feeds as a mean to stress /prove our hawkbit integration.

I don't think we're there, any longer - and considering the emphasis on an early release rather than a overly feature rich release - I would feel comfortable in releasing goofy as a source only product and leverage the released source base code for further investigation of the binary OS images release process.

My 2 cents.

Cheers
D

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: mercoledì 12 ottobre 2022 15:01
To: agustin.benito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxx; Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria.ext@xxxxxxxxxx>; Davide Ricci <davide.ricci@xxxxxxxxxx>; amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oniro-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; alberto@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Oniro v2,.0 release: relevant question

Hello,

I have understood as well that this is something we are aiming for in this release. I'm adding Davide and an extra email for Amit that might give us a better understanding of the reasoning and plans on this topic for 2.0.

Andrei Gherzan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Agustin Benito Bethencourt [mailto:agustin.benito@eclipse- 
> foundation.org]
> Sent: 11 October 2022 12:00
> To: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
> amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxx; Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria.ext@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: oniro-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; alberto@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Oniro v2,.0 release: relevant question
> 
> Hello Amit and Andrei,
> 
> since the beginning of the project onboarding into Eclipse Foundation, 
> we have been working on the basis that we would not release any image
> (binaries) on our first "release under EF".
> 
> There are several reasons for that, being the need to distribute 
> non-OSI approved licensed code and even proprietary code without EF 
> having any kind of legal relation with the copyright/patent holders, 
> one of the major concerns that led us to put such constrain. The idea 
> was to work on that direction for a second release.
> 
> The Oniro Platform Release Roadmap update presented to the PMC and the 
> Oniro WG SC some days ago does not state any news on this front. No 
> conversation in any public Oniro channel takes me to think that this 
> assumption has been challenged.
> 
> Still, I keep hearing that there are plans to release images for Oniro 
> as part of the Oniro v2.0
> 
> Can you clarify to me this point, please?
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> --
> Agustin Benito Bethencourt
> Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation
> Eclipse Foundation: The Community for Open Innovation and 
> Collaboration
> 



Back to the top