| Re: [nebula-dev] CDateTime version update? |
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation. It almost makes sense. That also means that the version of a bundle doesn't matter.
The question now again is how to deal with Nebula release components, as from my understanding there is no real release yet. Even the so called Nebula release plugins are in incubation state. NatTable on the other hand is separated from Nebula and did several releases according to the release process.
If Nebula has no real release and is therefore in incubation, does that mean every project that consumes Nebula widgets needs to conform the incubation branding? That would hurt several projects like for example papyrus.
Greez,
Dirk
The Eclipse Development Process has no notion of incubating *components*.
In fact, the EDP has no formal notion of component; notions of separate components within a mature project that are "incubating", "interim", "experimental" or whatever are project-specific notions.
A project can consume any bits that have been *released* by another project.
Permanent incubators, like the Nebula Incubator project cannot not do releases.
So... if you're talking about a component that's from a release version of mature projects Nebula or NatTable, then the EDP considers you good-to-go.
If you're talking about a component from the Nebula Incubator, you can't use it in another project's release until it's moved into the parent project and included in a release.
For completeness, you can include released code from a project in the incubation phase, but the consuming components would have to conform to the incubation branding requirements.
Does this make sense?
Wayne
On 04/05/16 05:42 AM, Wim Jongman wrote:
We are waiting on Wayne/EMO to respond.
Wayne/EMO:
* can release train projects consume incubation components from Nebula?
* If so, is there a restriction on the version number that these components must have e.g => 1.0.0?
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Dirk Fauth <dirk.fauth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Any opinions or information on that topic? Does anybody care?
Greez,
DirkAm 29.04.2016 11:24 schrieb "Wim Jongman" <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>:
When people consume a component they normally restrict the version number in that API range e.g. [0.0.0 1.0.0) (square bracket is inclusive and round bracket is exclusive). This means that peoples build would break when we do this.Normally the major version number is bumped when the API changes. However I am not sure if this rule also applies when going from 0.x.x to 1.0.0Dirk:* If so, is there a restriction on the version number that these components must have?cc-ing Wayne for comments.Wayne:
* can release train projects consume incubation components from Nebula?
The Stable widgets all deserve to go to version 1 if they are not yet.
I am not comfortable bumping the version number just to "make people feel good" or comply to some companies internal rules about version numbers. However, I also not want to block it.
Are there other opinions in the list?
Cheers,
Wim
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Dirk Fauth <dirk.fauth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Nebula Team,
I have a question regarding the version policy of our "released" widgets. In detail I'm talking about the CDateTime widget.
I created a NatTable editor based on CDateTime because the SWT DateTime control has several issues. There I realized that CDateTime is published with version 0.14.0. CDateTime also has a dependency to CWT which is published with version 0.9.0.
I just learned that there are release rules regarding the usage of plugins in incubation state. While of course Nebula as project is in incubation, people assume that the released widgets with a version >= 1.0.0 are stable and mature. But plugins with a version < 1.0.0 is still seen as incubation/unstable and therefore not allowed to use it within projects in the release train.
Honestly I'm not sure about that rules and NatTable is not part of the release train. But NatTable is consumed by projects in the release train. Now if NatTable breaks the release rules by consuming incubation plugins, it would affect these projects too.
There hasn't been a lot of activity in these two projects, despite some cleanups a few months ago.
I would like to bump the versions of these two projects to 1.0.0, so I am able to release a NatTable editor based on CDateTime without introducing issues to other release projects.
Are there any objections regarding such an update?
Greez,Dirk
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
--
Wayne Beaton on behalf of the Eclipse Management Organization
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev