| 
 
      I agree with that. Nebula is just an "aggregation" of individual
    widgets. It's not a real project (refering to the usual definition
    of project) since there is no global roadmap and objectives. 1
    widget == 1 (mini) project.
        
          
            My analysis for this is the following: 
 > Widget authors are pretty much individualists. We
              have many widgets and many authors but there is not sense
              of a "one product" like you would have for other projects.
              Every widget is more or less self sustained. Hence there
              is no "us". > Most widgets are feature complete. They have a
              described function and there is no reason to evolve this
              from year to year. But the current approach is actually working well since it fits
    contributors and consumers wishes.
 
 
 
      I agree with that. Nebula widgets are usually good quality and we
    can find documentations and snippet about how to use them. I guess a
    majority of the Eclipse-based RCP apps have used Nebula widget. I'm
    also sure that if a "complete" widget has a bug and needs a
    contribution, we can easily find someone to fix it (inside or
    outside of the known contributor set).
        
          
            > Feedback from the external community (consumers).
              I hear of many people consuming Nebula widgets, but there
              is not a desire or need to provide feedback apart from the
              occasional bug request. 
 
 
      Incubation is actually a cool status, it makes things easier
    sometimes. For Nebula, I also don't think there is a big benefit in
    turning it into a released project. But there is no issue in being a
    release neither...
        
          
            Conclusion: Having these thoughts, I think we
              are better of being as we were, a perpetual incubation
              project. 
 
 
      That's a good idea.
        
          
            
 
            I was also thinking to broaden the scope of Nebula and make
            it a home for widgets of other technologies like Swing,
            JFace, RAP and _javascript_. 
           I hope in most cases, SWT/JFace based widget would work with RAP. By
    the way, we should try to provide an RAP version of the Nebula
    examples.
 About Swing and _javascript_ in general, I'm not sure Nebula (and
    Eclipse in general) is the place where contributors would like to
    contribute the most...
 However, it would make a lot of sense to make Nebula host some
    high-level widgets dedicated to Orion.
 
 
 
      
    I would vote 0. 
 
      Showcase it on RAP.
        
          
            What would you improve in Nebula? 
 
      Yes, definitely.
        
          
            Do you think the project is still relevant? 
 
      I would vote +1 for Orion-based stuff, -1 for the other ones.
        
          
            What do you think about adding other
              technologies besides SWT? 
 
 Also, Wim, I hope you'll submit an overview of Nebula for EclipseCon
    France (deadline is April 15th) ;)
 
 |