| Red Hat: -1
It’s too blanket of a statement/question. I am finding too many concessions within MicroProfile, like the namespace change. In support of Tomitribe’s past points on MicroProfile benefits, I also think there are a lot of cultural benefits within MicroProfile that would benefit Jakarta that we haven’t even gotten to (like transparency and open meetings).
I understand that there is a rush to get this done for Jakarta EE 12, but within MicroProfile I have a MIcroProfiel hat on. On Jun 10, 2025, at 6:52 AM, Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you to the ones who have voted! Here is the summary. +1: Microsoft, IBM, Primeton, Payara -1: iJUG, Ostfalia (non-binding), Garden State JUG (non-binding) +0: Fujitsu
Thanks Emily On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 5:17 PM Alfonso Altamirano <alfonso.altamirano@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (Payara)
With the understanding that this is a transitionary measure.
This helps avoid conflicts with the pre-existing jakartaee/config repository.
|
--
|
|
Alfonso
Altamirano
Senior Software Engineer
|
This is a non-binding straw poll vote-only thread, detailed below. Anyone can vote. The working group member reps will be counted separately for the corresponding ballot projection. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).
Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated. Please respond by June 4th, 2025.
Thanks,
Emily
--
_______________________________________________ microprofile-wg mailing list microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
|
