Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][PLAN REVIEW] MicroProfile 7.1

[Jan Westerkamp <jan.westerkamp@xxxxxxx>]

+1 (iJUG)

Comment: There are still dependency issues like transitive dependencies 
on Jakarta EE component spec versions before version 10 left untouched, 
which will lead to unexpected behaviour for users when they intend to 
switch from the umbrella spec to specific MP component spec(s) like 
breaking changes in CDI version (3.x instead of 4.x).
Unfortunately, this is intended behaviour by the majority of the 
MicroProfile WG members currently, but iJUG disagrees here - we think 
this should be cleaned up in an upcoming release with updated MP 
component specs.

Best,
Jan

Am 20.02.25 um 23:24 schrieb John Clingan via microprofile-wg:
> To approve and ratify the Plan Review of the MicroProfile 7.1 
> Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is 
> requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 
> (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will 
> be appreciated.
>
> The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification 
> Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval 
> process using the relevant documents:
>
> https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/pull/254
>
> This ballot runs for seven days, so it ends on February 27th 2025 The 
> ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering 
> Committee members.  There is no veto. Community input and Community 
> votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering 
> Committee Representatives will be counted.
>
> --
> Thank you
> John Clingan on behalf of MicroProfile Steering Committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> microprofile-wg mailing list
> microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg