[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
Re: [microprofile-wg] MicroProfile 7.0 Ballot verbiage straw poll
 | 
  
    Proposal 5 (iJUG)
    
    
    Why:
    
    
    Proposal 1 is not safe in all intended
      cases, while some aspects could be helpful for releasing
    Proposal 3 is safe, but could be
      stricter than necessary in some cases
    Proposal 5 tries to deliver a
      compromise between the two (1 and 3).
    Proposal 4 is a bigger organisational
      change, that could be handled separately.
    
    
    We had a very good discussion at the
      last technical call, I think we need to continue this.
    And I think we do not run out of time
      for MP 7.0(.0), because the already foreseeable breaking changes
      in the Jakarta Core Profile (like Java SE 21 minimum, JPMS
      Requirements, Jakarta REST 4.0) will not allow the Proposal 1 way
      of shortcut - I expect we will have to do a MP 8.0(.0) anyway.
    
    
    
    It might be helpful for the ongoing
      discussion to separate out things we can agree on easier or where
      technical constraints give the answer, like:
    
    
    - Component spec relation (to component
      specs only, not to umbrella specs)
    - Umbrella spec relation (i.e. to
      umbrella specs of type provided - this depends on JPMS
      constraints)
    - Full support of Semantic Versioning
    
    - Moving all the specs to Jakarta
      (Proposal 4)
    
    
    I hope this will bring us further. Most
      of the aspects would be relevant for Jakarta too, so it should be
      discussed there and with them at some point.
    
    
    Best,
    Jan
    
    
    
    Am 19.05.23 um 19:24 schrieb John
      Clingan:
    
    
      
      Further
        to the previous email announcement,
        here is the Straw Poll for choosing the most popular proposals
        among proposal 1, 3 and 5.
      
        
      A
          Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please
          respond with ONE of the following based on your opinion:
        
          
        Proposal
            1: MicroProfile releases support a minimum Jakarta EE
            versions
          
            
          Proposal
              3: Release new MicroProfile versions when new Jakarta
              EE/Java SE LTS versions are released
            
              
            Proposal
                5: Release new MicroProfile versions following Semantic
                Versioning rules and adopt new Jakarta EE (and Java SE
                LTS) releases accordingly
              
                
              Any
                  feedback that you can provide to support your vote
                  will be appreciated.
                
                  
                Please
                    reply with "proposal number and organization name
                    ("community" for community members). Example: "1
                    (Acme Corporation)". Feel free to start a separate
                    thread for discussion. This straw poll runs for
                    seven days, so it ends on May 26th 2023. Community
                    input and Community votes are welcomed. However,
                    only the votes delivered by Steering Committee
                    Representatives will be counted towards the ballot
                    verbiage outlined in the linked announcement above.
               
             
           
         
       
      
      
      _______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg