Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] MicroProfile LRA 2.0 Specification Releas

[Michael Redlich <mpredli@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1 (Garden State JUG)

I wanted to mention that the images in the HTML version of the specification aren't rendered, but they are rendered in the PDF version.  I've noticed this behavior with AsciiDoctor, but haven't yet determined why.

Mike.

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:45 AM Roberto Cortez via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile LRA 2.0 Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated. 

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents:

https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/issues/184

This ballot will last fourteen days, ending on Thursday, March 2nd. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members. There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.

--
Thank you
Roberto Cortez, on behalf of the MicroProfile Steering Committee

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

--

Code, Test, Write, Cycle, Run, Drink, Sleep ... Repeat

Director, Garden State JUG

Lead Java Queue Editor, InfoQ

About Me

@mpredli

redlich.net/

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler

he/him/his