Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][MicroProfile Telemetry 1.0] Specification

[Jan Westerkamp <jan.westerkamp@xxxxxxx>]

Oh, yes sorry - I did it again on the right thread.
Just ignore it here...
Thanks Emily!

---

Von: microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> im Auftrag von Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. November 2022 00:02
An: Microprofile WG discussions <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][MicroProfile Telemetry 1.0] Specification - Release Review - VOTE by 28th November (2 weeks)

 

Jan,

I think you are voting MP OpenAPI 3.1 on MP Telemetry 1.0 ballot. Can you please check?

Thanks

Emily

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:00 PM Jan Westerkamp <jan.westerkamp@xxxxxxx> wrote:

0 (iJUG)

Why i voted with 0:

I found some issues that should be fixed. None of them are realy show stoppers, so they might be addressed in a following release too.

https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api/issues/551 Parent POM MP Rest Client version property is not in use and outdated

https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api/issues/552 JAX-RS version in spec document is outdated

https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api/issues/553 Deviation in openapi file postfix definition

Also there dependencies that resolved in a transitive way only (Jakarta REST and MP Config via MP Rest Client) - these should be direct dependencies instead.

I hope this could be fixed soon anyway.

Best,

Jan

---

Von: microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> im Auftrag von Summers Pittman ℝ <secondsun@xxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. November 2022 17:25
An: Microprofile WG discussions <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][MicroProfile Telemetry 1.0] Specification - Release Review - VOTE by 28th November (2 weeks)

 

+1 (AJUG)

Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java, _javascript_, K8s, Mobile

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 6:47 AM Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Please cast your votes asap!

Thanks

Emily

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:48 AM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 (IBM)

Thanks

Emily

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:04 PM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile Telemetry 1.0 Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents:

https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/issues/180

This ballot will be fourteen days, ending on Monday, November 28th.  The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members.  There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.

--

Thank you

Emily Jiang on behalf of the MicroProfile Steering Committee

--

Thanks
Emily

--

Thanks
Emily

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

--

Thanks
Emily