[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] Replace MicroProfile Compatibility Logo with compatible implementations web page. VOTE by Friday, November 12th
 | 
  
    -1 (iJUG)
    
    
    According to the current 2022 Program
      Plan draft strengthen the MicroProfile brand is a goal and a
      MicroProfile Compatibility Logo could support that.
    
    
    We are a community organisation
      representing users, which could be divided into two personas:
    
    
    - developers
    - decision makers
    
    
    
    This topic looks like a vendors
      decision only, to help promote compatible implementation. But on
      the other side at least the decision makers could benefit from the
      badge "on the Box" to choose an implementation.
    
    
    Of course, a Compatibility Program only
      works with a legal frame around it that prevents abuse and so
      damaging the brand - this is not for free and the EF could manage
      that on behalf of the MPWG.
    
    
    We could start implementing this with
      the TCK list only, following the original plan to do it like in
      Jakarta EE on the umbrella spec level, or even enhance it to the
      component spec level (and giving Jakarta EE a template back).
    
    
    
    While this ballot is done in
      combination with the ballot of reducing the membership fees there
      is a high potential not having the budget to keep the program. Is
      everybody aware of this fact?
    
    
    Suggestion: Can we handle such valid
      and important topics with such (hidden) links in a Steering
      Committee meeting (and on it's agenda with the necessary time to
      discuss it)?
    
    
    Best, Jan
    
    
    
    
    
    Am 05.11.21 um 19:59 schrieb John
      Clingan:
    
    
      
      Background
            discussion is available here and 
here. Compatible implementations will be required to
            pass the TCK. This ballot applies to all MicroProfile
            specifications. 
      
        
          
        
          
        RESOLVED, the Steering Committee confirms that the MicroProfile
        working group will operate without a MicroProfile compatibility
        program and will not develop and utilize a Compatibility logo
        for use by compatible implementations of MicroProfile, and
        instead will allow any implementation that can make bonafide
        claims of compatibility in accordance with the Eclipse
        Foundation Specification Process to be listed and linked to as a
        compatible implementation on its webpage.
      
      
      _______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg