|
+1 (Payara)
Product Manager / Developer Advocate
Payara
- Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications
T: +1 415 523 0175 | UK: +44 207 754 0481 | M: 0044 7412 588
569
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payara-Tech LDA, Registered Office: Rua Nova de São Pedro no. 54, 2nd floor, room “D”, 9000 048 Funchal, Ilha da Madeira,
Portugal
VAT: PT 515158674 | www.payara.fish | info@xxxxxxxxxxx | @Payara_Fish
If at any time you would like to unsubscribe from Payara communications, simply respond to this email with 'Unsubscribe' in the title, or instantly unsubscribe from all types of
communication here.
From: microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Tetiana Fydorenchyk <tf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 11:08 AM
To: Microprofile WG discussions <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [microprofile-wg] MPWG_SCR Final update. Approval of April 27th Steering Committee Meeting Minutes. Request vote by May 17th
+1 (Jelastic)
+1 (Committer Representative)
OK, hoping this is the final revision for ballot. Please vote by May 17th
MicroProfile
Steering Committee Meeting - April 27th, 2021
Rules
-
DO NOT EDIT AGENDA. This is the responsibility of the
meeting moderator with input from the steering committee and community. Agenda items should be discussed in the mailing list/forum or in prior Steering Committee meetings first.
-
Prefer comments occur in mailing lists/forums.
-
Document editing is enabled for community to add themselves
to list of community contributors during call
Tweeted pic
here,
recording here, meeting minutes folder here
|
Meeting Attendees
|
|
Steering Committee
(Quorum = 6)
|
Community
(Name, organization)
|
|
Atlanta JUG -
Summers Pittman,
Vincent Mayers
Fujitsu -
Kenji Kazamura
IBM -
Kevin Sutter,
Emily Jiang
iJUG -
Jelastic - Ruslan
Synytsky, Tetiana Fydorenchyk
Garden State JUG
- Chandra Guntur,
Michael Redlich
Oracle -
Ed Bratt,
Dmitry Kornilov
Payara -
Rudy
De Busscher
Red Hat -
John Clingan,
Roberto Cortez
Tomitribe - David
Blevins, Amelia Eiras
Committer Member:
Edwin Derks
Eclipse
Foundation
Paul
Buck
Sharon
Corbett
Ivar
Grimstad
Tanja Obradovic
|
|
|
Agenda Item
|
Minutes
|
|
Past meeting minutes
approval
|
|
|
Business since last
Steering Committee Meeting
|
|
|
Current Items
|
MicroProfile
Patent Options Discussion
Meeting consumed
all 60 minutes of Live Hangout time slot.
-
Presentation.
EMO presented on Patent Policy options since the MicroProfile Working Group needs to select an option.The two options are “Implementation Patent” or “Compatible Implementation Patent”.
-
Discussion
-
Compatible Implementation Policy - protects against fragmentation
and patents become a legal enforcement approach to compatibility. The Spark Plug community discussed this being a barrier to adoption.
-
Patent license - implementations that do not have to 100%
pass the TCK. This approach favors adoption over compliance.Whether or not an implementation is compatible becomes a legal question.
-
Only one patent license policy applies per spec project.
MicroProfile specifications are managed under a single project. Theoretically, if MicroProfile split specs into separate projects, each project could choose its patent policy with approval by the Steering Committee.
-
Is there a 3rd option - Collective Defense? Currently
not an option.
-
Paul noted that Jakarta EE working group chose the compatible
implementation license and that the Spark Plug working group is in discussion on IP patent policy.
-
Paul recommended a straw poll vote to understand where
we stand as a working group on the two patent options. We agreed to give it two weeks. This would be followed up by a formal vote on one of the two (draft) resolutions outlined in the presentation.
-
The first 15 minutes discussed whether or not the meeting
should be recorded based on an objection. It was pointed out that any member of the Steering Committee can request that a meeting not be recorded. The meeting was not recorded
-
The EMO presenters did not consent to recording the agenda topic. This was communicated to the chair as the call was getting
underway.
-
We agreed that Steering Committee members must be notified
of non-recorded meetings ahead of time.
-
For reference, the
Eclipse
Foundation Intellectual Property Policy.
|
|
Next Steering Committee
call
|
|
|
Parking Lot
|
Compatibility Certification
Request Format
|
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
--
|
