Re: [microprofile-wg] Payara as MicroProfile compliant implementation

[lenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Thanks, Emily,

Can you point me to the discussion about 4.1 process?

Thank you

On Apr 28, 2021, at 4:59 PM, Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From my best knowledge, there was no compliance guideline defined for MP 4.0, which was a marketing release. It is not required to file CCRs for the implementation. CCR was for releasing specifications. In Open Liberty, we ran our build against MP tcks and documented the tset result here. MP is in the process of defining the certification process in the MP 4.1 release. 

Thanks

Emily

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:48 PM <lenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I am in the process of making Payara MP-4.0-compliant implementation.
Currently, the only way I see to do this is to open CCRs for each individual Specs.
Is there a plan in place to just have one CCR for all of MicroProfile?
If there is, is there a timeframe for this to happen?

I am trying to decide if it’s worth to do CCRs for all the Specs individually or wait
for the “umbrella” spec compatibility issue process to be developed.

I would gladly contribute to this effort as well.

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

--

Thanks
Emily

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg