Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [External] : Re: [BALLOT] [Reactive Streams Operators 2.0] Specification Release Review - VOTE by March 30th (two weeks)

I thought I did vote +1 (Oracle). Please could it if I forgot.

--  Dmitry

On 31. 3. 2021, at 12:55, Roberto Cortez via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I declare this ballot complete and approved. 

The summary of the votes is below:

Representative Representative for: Vote
Summers Pittman, Vincent Mayers Atlanta JUG +1
Kevin Sutter, Emily Jiang IBM +1
Ruslan Synytsky, Tetiana Fydorenchyk Jelastic +1
John Clingan, Roberto Cortez Red Hat +1
David Blevins, Amelia Eiras Tomitribe +1
Chandra Guntur, Michael Redlich
Garden State Java User Group
Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov Oracle
Rudy De Busscher Payara +1
Jan Westerkamp iJUG
Edwin Derks Committer Member +1
Total 7
Non-binding votes Role Vote
Total 0

Unfortunately, Sonatype deleted the staged repository, and we cannot push the final binaries without doing another release. While the binaries are going to be the same (nothing new is going to be added), these will not be exactly the same binaries we voted on. John and Keven, this is somehow an unexpected situation. How should we proceed? Are we ok to do the release using the same tag and push, or do we have to go with another vote?

We may need to figure something out regarding the staging repository, since it seems Sonatype will delete repositories from time to time, so this may happen again.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Roberto

On 16 Mar 2021, at 00:07, Roberto Cortez via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators 2.0 Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated. 

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents:

https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/issues/27

This ballot will be fourteen days, ending on Tuesday, March 30th. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members. There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.

--
Thank you
Roberto Cortez on behalf of MicroProfile Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!JSJthBnBHjrVSUtsFimWHRyUAuIThS6gL8h3Kie7zJQkY4faLBCLth8XVo_6r4HxGeLN$


Back to the top