Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[messaging-dev] An Attempt at Triaging Issues

Ondro/others,

As I had suggested, I took a stab at triaging the old issues that have been there for some time now. Here are the results:

* https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q7XfC-zNend0aT8PKbcOTbKx_9tXPrhmolBI9iPr4BE/edit?usp=sharing

From my perspective here is a summary:

* There are a very small number of issues I think makes sense to look at for the next release (they are under the label "Worth looking at first").

* There are a very small number of issues folks that end users could easily pick up (they are under the label "Good first issue").

* The big ticket issues really worth working on are CDI Message Listeners, a Java SE bootstrap API, AMQP interoperability and Kafka interoperability/modernizing Messaging. Similarly there are very forward looking things that are a bit too premature like Reactive Messaging.

* There are a ton of issues I think could be looked at further if there is time (they are under the label "Should be evaluated further"). I did order these somewhat, with more end-user focused features first. The rest I think are mostly issues that vendors would really care about. These perhaps made sense at a point where there was more time, resources and investment around this particular specification. I don't think that is the case for a majority of Messaging vendors any more.

* There are a ton of issues I think should just be closed or assigned very low priority. They perhaps made sense at a point where there was more time, resources and investment around this particular specification. I don't think that is the case for a majority of Messaging vendors any more.

I do encourage other folks to give this a try - especially the end users with a genuine real world interest in the specification.

Hope this helps.

Reza Rahman

Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker

Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.


Back to the top