Re: [lyo-dev] Proposal: Remove non-OSLC4J Bugzilla adapter from Lyo

[Samuel Padgett <spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1, I agree.

Is the plan to keep the adapter in the docs repository and simply remove the one in the server repository?
--
Best Regards,
Samuel Padgett | IBM Rational | spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx


Steve Speicher ---10/17/2012 09:28:24 AM---This makes good sense to me.  The new OSLC4J-based one is fairly complete and actively used.

From:	Steve Speicher <sspeiche@xxxxxxxxx>
To:	Lyo project developer discussions <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:	10/17/2012 09:28 AM
Subject:	Re: [lyo-dev] Proposal: Remove non-OSLC4J Bugzilla adapter from Lyo
Sent by:	lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

This makes good sense to me.  The new OSLC4J-based one is fairly complete and actively used.

-- 
- Steve

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Michael Fiedler <fiedler.mf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As part of the creation of the OSLC workshop, the Bugzilla sample
adapter was re-factored/re-written using OSLC4J.  Lyo now has two
Bugzilla adapters, the non-OSLC4J version in the
org.eclipse.lyo.server.git repo and the OSLC4J version in the
org.eclipse.lyo.docs.git repo (along with the rest of the workshop)

Going forward it would be easiest to only maintain 1 version of the
adapter.  Any objections or comments on removing the non-OSLC4J
version?  Please respond on-list if you have a need for the non-OSLC4J
version or have some argument for keeping it.   Of course, it won't be
gone forever as Git magic can bring it back if needed.   I'll wait a
week for any feedback.

I've opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=392162 to track this.

Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev

_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev