Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?

From: Alphonse Van Assche <alcapcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:45:40 +0200
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=XpyAqhfgKXusO9eqG9TclLCdmXRyuaqh+x7QNsrLHkHXjfRENLV00XOlMTsudi5V9C F1rh7WwgVnVyD/Tg2qZ5AfC44lHcEuTAo7Hm9FQxB0WLbuEOwOk0Pwu9Fm8agDKBd8TI 08HZVPFQKOOxHXKGmGshlODDpBKejOiqqD1Wc=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

2009/6/2 Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> I think it makes sense for our 0.3 release to target Galileo
> dependencies since it'll be after the release of Galileo.  What do
> people think?
>
+1

References:
- [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?
  - From: Andrew Overholt

Prev by Date: [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?
Next by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?
Previous by thread: [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?
Next by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.3 for Galileo?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs