[jta-dev] CDI interceptors should marked the transaction for rollback fo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jta-dev] CDI interceptors should marked the transaction for rollback for unchecked exceptions not only for RuntimeExceptions

From: Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:07:15 +0100
Delivered-to: jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jta-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev>, <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jta-dev>, <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I am writing to raise awareness of an outstanding issue that was raised earlier this year:

https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/issues/191

And has a pull request for it:

https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/192

Would anyone disagree with such a change being added to Jakarta Transactions?

The implication for me is that some implementations which may not have previously been dealing with java.lang.Error unchecked exception classes in the same way as java.lang.RuntimeException would become in-compliant with the specification.

Many thanks,

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jta-dev] CDI interceptors should marked the transaction for rollback for unchecked exceptions not only for RuntimeExceptions
  - From: Tom Jenkinson

Prev by Date: Re: [jta-dev] Do you plan to move your TCK tests out of the Platform TCK project for Jakarta EE 10+?
Next by Date: Re: [jta-dev] Possible release of jakarta.transaction-api 1.3.4?
Previous by thread: [jta-dev] Do you plan to move your TCK tests out of the Platform TCK project for Jakarta EE 10+?
Next by thread: Re: [jta-dev] CDI interceptors should marked the transaction for rollback for unchecked exceptions not only for RuntimeExceptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs