I have a related but somewhat separate query.
What about getting the Arquillian project donated to EE4J? Who do we ask at Red Hat about this? I would be happy to lead such a project since it would not technically be a specification with IP flow concerns I am pretty sure there is enough people in the community that would sign up to be committers. In my view, this is the best way of making the project more active and more aligned to Jakarta EE/MicroProfile than it has been after the original project leadership left.
Could someone from Red Hat kindly comment?
Reza Rahman
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
From: jakartaee-tck-dev <jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Olivier Lamy <olamy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 3:54 AM
To: jakartaee-tck developer discussions
Subject: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Is Arquillian still alive?
Hi,
We discussed using arquillian which sounds like a good idea.
I started looking at Jetty support but I have a bit of concern on the project.
last commit 31/03/2017 [1]
and tomcat support is not better [2]
I guess we have some contacts here @ redhat to ask if
maintenance/upgrade is scheduled?
As Jetty committer I'm happy to do the job on jetty support.
Toughts?
cheers
--
Olivier
[1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-jetty
[2] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-container-tomcat
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
