Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT-DISCUSS] Plan Review of Jakarta EE Validation 4.0
After discussion in the Specification Committee today, we want this ballot to continue as planned with the action to the project team to migrate the issues as soon as possible during the release cycle.

Ivar

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 8:01 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I kinda agree with Ed.
If we need to discuss, we need to be able to add comments in the issues themselves. Creating the same issues on our infra seems the most straightforward approach.


On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 7:34 PM Ed Bratt via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It is a bit concerning to me that the issues referenced in this Specification Proposal are on an archived issue tracker and cannot be edited. These include

I notice there is an open issue 'beanvalidation.org is no longer maintained' -- which may have a relationship to my concern.

Would the specification committer team be willing to migrate these issues to the Jakarta Validation GH repository issue tracker? I have filed https://github.com/jakartaee/validation/issues/256 to capture my suggestion.

I'd prefer that the committer team invest a modicum of its energy in creating a new site, hosted in Eclipse or GitHub pages and migrating any issues that are still relevant and I'd rather see this detailed in the proposal for EE 12.

-- Ed

On 4/25/2025 1:36 AM, Ivar Grimstad via jakarta.ee-spec wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the plan for the Jakarta Validation 4.0 specification.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to approve the plan of this release (as defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Friday, May 2, 2025, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,
--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 


_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Je2-jhEvWGW9K2ybdiSwHLHjncqqE3reXC8b6RYPoyvoX-ph6Poj_u7wXk8YH9xkhXcRuU9jKqOQ95zm63ivwOkU2z0$
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

Back to the top