[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : [DISCUSS] Release Review for Jakarta Interceptors 2.2
|
Still not noticing a CCR against the Interceptors
project issue list. Am I looking in the right place?
Ostensibly, the ballot concludes today. Is the team working on
this?
-- Ed
On 3/29/2024 12:30 PM, Ed Bratt via
jakarta.ee-spec wrote:
-1, Oracle -- First two points on the list below are what lead
to this vote
- I do not see a CCR in the Interceptors project JIRA. For
proper record keeping, I would strongly advise a tracking
issue be created for this, even if the test results are
included in a CDI CCR. (The CDI CCR for Weld, does not
mention Interceptors)
- Since I cannot locate a link to the actual TCK, I cannot
validate any of the contents in that document
- Please update the PR for the Spec. page to include
a link to the CCR.
- Similar to my comments on the CDI ballot, I do not see any
SHA SUMs so we have no ability to track which TCK was actually
used to certify WELD. These should be included in the CCR
issue as well as in the archival document at the product site,
showing the certification results.
- I believe the Spec. page must be revised to state minimum
Java SE version is 17 (similar to my comment on CDI)
I will be happy to revise this if the TCK coordinates and a CCR
issue could be provided in the documentation. I apologize for
not reviewing the content earlier.
-- Ed
On 3/19/2024 7:59 AM, Emily Jiang via
jakarta.ee-spec wrote:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,
I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of
Jakarta
Interceptors 2.2 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform
11 release.
The JESP/EFSP requires a successful
ballot of
the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products
of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is
defined in the EFSP).
The relevant materials are available here:
Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot,
ending on Tuesday, April 2nd, 2024, that
requires a Super-majority positive vote of the
Specification Committee members (note that there is no
veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast
by Specification Committee Representatives will be
counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of
representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member
Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe,
Primeton Information Technologies, and Shandong Cvicse
Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent
the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer
Members.
Specification Committee representatives,
your vote is hereby requested. Please respond
with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1
(reject). Any feedback that you can provide to
support your vote will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Emily Jiang
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Pib3MgPZ0NdRRx0OufyAlm9vconbgaWueN7T1xYcJLQ7tHnyYKHEkfrOS-BWEp_XI_hQvbLiXp4VysYgrYz1RWhIB98$
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!JRPr60d-eU7-eqUgwn6_Kb3cGh0L6LHvYSuoVcr0F8x8YYIm8oi7rbbthaNjJ2-p6Jqrefa2DrkmetFACIikLeU6zQY$