| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1 |
+1
Werner
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Ivar Grimstad
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 18:03
To: Jakarta specification discussions
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1
Here's another reminder. This time for Jakarta Batch 2.1.
This ballot will close tomorrow (March 16). I am missing votes from:
Oracle
Participant Members (LJC)
All other members have voted.
Ivar
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 5:56 PM Andrew Pielage <andrew.pielage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (Payara)
Thanks,
Andrew Pielage
Java Developer at Payara Services Ltd
Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications
_______________________________________________From: jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 02 March 2022 07:47
To: Jakarta specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,
I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Batch 2.1 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.
The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).
The relevant materials are available here:
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/438
- https://deploy-preview-438--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/batch/2.1/
Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Wednesday, March 16, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
Thanks,Ivar
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration.
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
