Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Agenda for the February 7th Jakarta EE S

[David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Added some comments.

Short version: It's ok for us to hope for one thing and end up with another.  We should adjust based on where we actually landed vs where we hoped to land.

We didn't really create any Java 21 innovations, so what advantage do we get by forbidding vendors to sell to the Java 17 audience?

Not a fan of the Apple style of "innovation" where you just remove things for the sake of removing them.

Again, if we had Java 21 features there'd be no discussion.


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Feb 6, 2024, at 6:44 PM, Scott Stark via jakarta.ee-spec.committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> For consideration given the current lack of a unanimous opinion on the
> handling of Java SE versions:
> https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/issues/77
> 
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:56 PM Paul Buck via jakarta.ee-spec.committee
> <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The agenda for our committee call on Wednesday at 17:00 UTC is here. Please add any other business items as required.
>> 
>> Zoom link - https://eclipse.zoom.us/j/102354706
>> 
>> Password: SpecCmte
>> 
>> Thanks ... Paul
>> _______________________________________________
>> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
>> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee