Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
Correct.

On Jul 6, 2021 at 3:04:09 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 6, 2021, at 6:33 AM, Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The minimum compromise approach Red Hat would support would be to remove any optional TCK sets as a requirement to ratify a profile specification. Just kicking this can down the road for another release without some remediation of the current burden optional features place on the ratification process is not acceptable.

Confirming I understood correctly.  You would support an approach where the CMP/BMP TCK tests are still present in the TCK, but not required for ratification.  Of course any implementation that implements CMP/BMP would still be required to pass those tests.

Did I read that correctly?


-David

Back to the top