Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Proposal for handling "optional" feature

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Just to show that
I found this thread...  ;-)  

We started this
discussion on today's Spec Committee call.  Limited participation,
but the general direction seemed to be acceptable.  A couple of participants
would like more time to digest the document before commenting.  Please
review the meeting minutes for our discussion points.  

Let's use this
thread to discuss any additional items before our next Spec Committee call.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       Paul
Buck <paul.buck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Jakarta
specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       04/30/2021
14:18
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Proposal for handling "optional"
features in Jakarta EE Working Group's specification
Sent
by:        "jakarta.ee-spec.committee"
<jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Dan Bandera in collaboration with
Scott Stark and Kevin Sutter authored a proposal for how the Jakarta EE
Working Group should handle "optional" features in specifications.
The document is here,
please review, provide comments and suggested edits. I will include this
as an agenda topic in our Specification Committee call on Wednesday, May
5th.

Thanks ... Paul

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee