| [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Review for approval: Jakarta EE Specification Committee Meeting Minutes - April 7th, 2021 |
Attendees (present in bold):
Kenji Kazumura - Fujitsu
Dan Bandera - IBM - Kevin Sutter, Tom Watson
Ed Bratt - Oracle - Dmitry Kornilov
Andrew Pielage - Payara - Matt Gill
Scott Stark - Red Hat - Mark Little, Scott Marlow
David Blevins - Tomitribe - Jean-Louis Monteiro, Cesar Hernandez
Ivar Grimstad - PMC Representative
Marcelo Ancelmo - Participant Member - Martijn Verburg
Werner Keil - Committer Member
Jun Qian - Primeton - Enterprise Member
Eclipse Foundation: Tanja Obradovic, Paul Buck (chair)
Past business / action items:
Approval is requested for the meeting minutes from the March 24th meeting as drafted - Approved.
Agenda:
Ongoing tracking spreadsheet of individual specs progress through the JESP
Jakarta EE 9.1 Plan Review ballot complete and approved
Jakarta EE 10 - Deadline for projects to start Plan Reviews is April 15th
Approval required for creating new profiles, see Specification section in the EFSP
Specification Committee’s input to the Jakarta EE 2021 Program Plan - Quarterly Progress presentation and the Jakarta EE 2021 Progress by Quarter tracking spreadsheet [Tanja]
Q1: Rows 7, 29 and 42
Q2: Row 11
See the spreadsheet linked above for notes on the items discussed
Denoting which implementation was used to ratify a specification:
Ballot for the individual specification pages was resolved, Option 3 “Include the compatible implementation in the list of release artifacts at the top of the spec page” was preferred.
Individual specification pages to be updated be opportunistically as other updates are required. For an example see the JSON Processing 2.0 specification page.
For the Platform and Web Profile specifications, in previous discussions the Specification Committee decided to not list “other/additional” compatible implementations of the Platform or Web Profile specifications, a link will be added to these two spec project pages to the Jakarta EE Compatible Products page. Any objections? No objections raised.
Kevin to update these pages to show which implementation(s) was used for ratification as was agreed to on the recent ballot, and update the Compatible Implementations section to provide a link to the Compatible Products page. Refer to https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/350
Ed Bratt noted the email list (in all the TCKs) that is documented for escalating disputes is jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx, since this is a private committee list, any email sent to this list, not from a committee member, will bounce
Recommendation the documented list be updated to jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx. Any objections?
No objections raised, please proceed to make the updates
TCK Process (https://jakarta.ee/committees/specification/tckprocess) is already been updated
An alternative to making this change would be to remove the user guide content regarding the `Test Appeals Process` and instead link to ... https://jakarta.ee/committees/specification/tckprocess
Jakarta NoSql PR [Ivar]
Should we allow updates to spec pages between reviews? Or reject this one?
The Specification Committee agreed that in general after a Spec Committee member reviews the requested update and approves, the PR can be merged.