Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Fw: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta EE "javase" specifications
"src" vs "master" is an artifact of how the repo evolved.  Think of it as "master" and "gh-pages" if that helps.  And yes, it's confusing.  Hopefully they're going to fix that.

In any event, Eclipse wants more control over this repo so they want us to submit PRs, which they will accept as appropriate, and which their automated process will use to generate the web site in master.

Kevin Sutter wrote on 2/21/20 7:53 AM:
I thought that we (mere mortals) were supposed to commit to "src" and the web team will take care of merging into "master"...  Is there anyway to open up "src" for the spec committee?  Thanks!

Otherwise, why do we have "src" and "master"?  If we don't have write access, then we can only do PRs and let the other review it and merge into "master".  Seems kind of confusing...

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        02/20/2020 16:01
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Fw: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta EE "javase" specifications
Sent by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Hi Kevin,

Currently, it is the members of the web team at Eclipse that are committers to the web page. The PRs are normally processed within 24 hours, but if it takes longer we can probably request for someone in the Specification Committee to be added to the committer list.

Ivar

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:55 PM Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just noticed that I don't have write access to this repo?  https://github.com/jakartaee/jakarta.ee

Do I have to open a bug report to get this resolved?  How were the list of committers determined?

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx    Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        "Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        02/20/2020 14:26
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Fw: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta EE "javase" specifications
Sent by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Here's the PR for the updated Operations Guide:  https://github.com/jakartaee/jakarta.ee/pull/641.  Looking for a review/approval by anyone on the Spec Committee.  Thanks!

I also found an approved PR that had deleted the old version of the Ops Guide, but it hadn't been merged yet.  It is now...  :-)

I am still on the hook to document my findings on duplicate information or lack of information (like a more elaborate finalization checklist).

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx    Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        Kevin Sutter/Rochester/IBM
To:        Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        02/20/2020 13:23
Subject:        Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Fw: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta EE "javase" specifications


Thanks, Bill, for letting me know about the markdown version...  I was updating the wrong one...  I will submit a separate PR to mark this file (whole repo?) as legacy and point at the jakarta.eerepo instead.

Not sure about a more elaborate finalization checklist...  What I am finding is that we have similar information posted in multiple places for this Spec Release process...  I will at least create an Issue with what I have found so that can consolidate.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx    Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter




From:        Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        02/20/2020 12:48
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Fw: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta EE "javase" specifications



Kevin Sutter wrote on 2/20/20 9:53 AM:
  • For the most part, the operations guidewas quite accurate.  I have made a few updates and will be creating a PR shortly.
Note that the operations guide is now a Markdown file in the jakarta.eerepo and updates need to be made there.  The version in our repo should be removed, or replaced with a pointer to the official version.


The one item I have question on is the releasing of the staged artifacts to Maven Central.  The ops guide says this:
  • When the ballot request PRs are approved, release staged artifacts to Maven Central. Advice on this can be found MavenReleaseScript.

This pointer is to a script that could be used by a developer to release the staged artifacts for a given project.  Questions:
  • Whose responsibility is it to release these artifacts to Maven Central?  I would think the Specification Project.  But, the instructions might imply it's up to the Specification Committee.  I don't think I have access or ability to release the artifacts for these projects.  I'd like to clarify the ops guide.
It has to be the specification project team.
  • We may be in a strange limbo state since it looks like all of the JavaSE PRs used the old nexus sonatype for staging.  Is this still available for doing the releasing to Maven Central?  Or, do these artifacts need to be re-staged again to the jakartaee instance and then released?
For Activation I'm in the process of restaging and then pushing.  I don't know how easy that will be for the other APIs.




_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee



_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee


--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.


Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee




_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!O04-d_DAO1fM3M_L5pN3wvHvSDcXAO6WtXfE5iMs2SqCG6REOcVdrPc_yDT-A0Z0Fg$

Back to the top