Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Contributing and Jakartifying Specification Documents

I've tweaked my text a little and turned it into a Google Doc. It's in the team drive.

There's a link in that document to the "Projects, Specifications, and Documents" spreadsheet which I've updated to include the status of the copyright assignment for all specifications. There's a couple of handy charts on the first tab. The "Spec Rights Acquired" tab has a pivot table that groups the specifications by status.

HTH,

Wayne



On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:38 AM Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greetings Specification Committee.

I've listed the specifications for which I have received approval to contribute at the bottom of this message. As we did with the Full and Web Profile documents, I will contribute the document to the corresponding project team via IPZilla. The IP Team is standing by push these contributions through their vetting process (which should only take a few minutes for each document). 

I stand ready to start contributing these documents when the Specification Committee gives me the "go ahead" (recall that we need to give the project teams some guidance regarding what we expect them to do with these documents; i.e., what specifically needs to be done to to "Jakartify" the document).

With these documents in hand, I believe that there are three possible courses of action for each project team:
  1. Ignore it;
  2. Jakartify the document and make it available as a service release; or
  3. Jakartify the document, add new content, and make it available as a new Final Specification.
For a service release, per the process, ballot approval from the Specification Committee is required. With approval in place, the project team can update their existing /specification record with a reference to the new document (the Specification Committee may need to provide some guidance regarding how this manifests).

For a new Final Specification, the project team will need to first engage in a Plan Review, and the rest of the process, culminating in a Release Review and the creation of a new /specification record representing the new version.

Strictly speaking, a project team can engage in the Jakartification of the document without immediately engaging in any reviews (i.e., just update the document and leave it in the repository). In this event, it would need to be made clear that the Jakartified document cannot be used to create an implementation until after it is ratified as a Final Specification.

I can expand on any of these options if necessary.

Jakarta EE Full Profile
Jakarta EE Web Profile

Jakarta Annotations
Jakarta Enterprise Beans
Jakarta _expression_ Language
Jakarta Security
Jakarta Server Faces
Jakarta Interceptors
Jakarta Authorization
Jakarta Activation
Jakarta Managed Beans
Jakarta Deployment
Jakarta XML RPC
Jakarta Authentication
Jakarta Mail
Jakarta XML Binding
Jakarta RESTful Web Services
Jakarta Web Services Metadata
Jakarta XML Web Services
Jakarta Connectors
Jakarta Persistence
Jakarta JSON Binding
Jakarta JSON Processing
Jakarta Debugging Support for Other Languages
Jakarta Server Pages
Jakarta Transactions
Jakarta WebSocket

Wayne
--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.




--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.



Back to the top