Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Plan B Deliverable for JakartaOne and OC

["Daniel Bandera" <bandera@xxxxxxxxxx>]

IMHO, we must
have a new alternative "headline" prepared as I mentioned
in our Steering Committee call today.   I think the reduced scope
of the Web Profile as suggested by Kevin is probably our most viable, achievable
option by September 10, with the Full Profile achievement announced at
EclipseCon Europe 2019 in October.  I certainly hope we can reach
consensus on this position.

Best regards,
Dan

Dan Bandera
(512) 286-5228
Program Director, Blockchain, Istio, Java technologies, Node.js 
IBM Open Technologies, Austin, Texas
The OSGi Alliance ( osgi.org ) President and Board of Directors





From:
       David
Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Jakarta
specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       2019-08-06
05:21 PM
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Plan B Deliverable for JakartaOne and OC1?
Sent
by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

> On Aug 6, 2019, at 2:32 PM,
Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> What about if we would limit our focus to just Jakarta EE 8 Web Profile?

That's an *extremely* compelling idea.

Given how intertwined the Full and WebProfile TCK is (the same), it may
not pan out, but that doesn't mean we couldn't prioritize Web Profile specs
first.  If we're clever, maybe there's something we can do about the
TCK issue, such as simply name it "jakartaee-webprofile-tck"
and declare it can only be used for web profile certification despite having
more tests.

Also brainstorming out loud.  Certainly worth talking about at tomorrow's
spec meeting.

-David



_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee