[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Plan B Deliverable for JakartaOne and OC1?
|
The problem is that the Web Profile is defined *relative to* the full
platform. Without a full platform, you have nothing to base the Web
Profile on.
David Blevins wrote on 8/6/19 3:21 PM:
>> On Aug 6, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What about if we would limit our focus to just Jakarta EE 8 Web Profile?
>
> That's an *extremely* compelling idea.
>
> Given how intertwined the Full and WebProfile TCK is (the same), it may not pan out, but that doesn't mean we couldn't prioritize Web Profile specs first. If we're clever, maybe there's something we can do about the TCK issue, such as simply name it "jakartaee-webprofile-tck" and declare it can only be used for web profile certification despite having more tests.
>
> Also brainstorming out loud. Certainly worth talking about at tomorrow's spec meeting.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
>
