I submitted as myself. I'm not sure what the
transparent/visibility requirements ought to be. One can see the
current status (pie-chart with totals of:
approved/abstain/reject), but not (publicly, anyway) who cast
what vote. Bill had previously +1'ed this. I hope the poll
administration feature provides the details to ensure that the
ballot box isn't being stuffed.
I know Dan
is the official voice for IBM, but I just tried the Ballot and
it worked just fine for me. I hope this works out on your
end.
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx
Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From:
Werner
Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx>
To:
Jakarta
specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
06/14/2019
02:36 PM
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] Re:
[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Ballots via Google Forms
Sent by:
jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
As long as the result is
publicly and transparently visible, why not.
See my recent message
although the reason for Oliver’s confusion about the
approval and time before the project was created may simply
be the endless paperwork stuck (from what we heard in the
calls mostly at Tomitribe and its legal team) between our
approval here and the formal creation of Jakarta NoSQL only
a few days ago…
Werner
From: Wayne
Beaton
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 21:19
To: Jakarta
specification committee
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Ballots via
Google Forms
Ed has inspired me to
try a different approach for ballots.
I've cobbled together a
Google Form to capture votes for the Jakarta EE Platform
restructuring. I've marked it as "unofficial", so consider
your interaction with the form as nonbinding. I've
configured so that it requires that you sign-in and specify
your email address. I've configured it to allow you to
revisit and change your answer.
AFAICT, there's no
built-in way to restrict who gets to vote. I also can't sort
out an easy way to prevent somebody from answering for
somebody else (there're some tricks, but they're
cumbersome). In short, we can use it to run a ballot, but
I'm not sure that we can use the results.
Anyway... please have a
look. Let me know
what you think.
Wayne
--
Wayne
Beaton
Director
of Open Source Projects | Eclipse
Foundation, Inc.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
