Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] BALLOT: Approval to restructure as speci

["Daniel Bandera" <bandera@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1, approve.

Best regards,
Dan

Dan Bandera
(512) 286-5228
Program Director, Blockchain, Istio, Java technologies, Node.js 
IBM Open Technologies, Austin, Texas
The OSGi Alliance ( osgi.org ) President and Board of Directors





From:
       Wayne
Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Jakarta
specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       2019-06-14
10:33 AM
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] BALLOT: Approval to restructure as  
     specification projects (round one)
Sent
by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Greetings Specification Committee Members

FYI, I am one vote short of Super-majority
in this matter. There's still time.

I need everyone to vote, please.

Wayne

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:01 AM Wayne
Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Greetings Specification Committee...

Here is the first round of conversions
from regular Eclipse Projects into Specification Projects. I've grouped
five projects into this first Restructuring Review. 

The purpose of a Restructuring Review
is to change the nature of a project. Since the Eclipse Foundation Specification
Process (EFSP) does not specifically deal with the notion of restructuring,
I'm following the Eclipse Development Process (EDP). While we are not strictly
creating a new project, we are in a manner of thinking, creating new Specification
Projects from the existing ones. With this in mind, I am treating this
as a Creation Review from the perspective of the Specification Committee
approval requirement. 

I have created a Restructuring
Review record that provides
the high level details of the intention. I've pasted it below for your
quick review and for posterity. In all cases, I've included the scope statement
for the specification itself; the specification project's scope will be
to "provide the specification document and supporting technical artifacts"
for the corresponding specification.

The review documentation includes links
to GitHub Issues that provide more details regarding what will change.
In the case of "Eclipse Project for JAX-RS", for example, we
are compelled to change the project id and the name of the GitHub repository
to avoid names that Oracle lays claim to.

Here is the project list:

Eclipse Project for JAX-RS will be renamed to "Jakarta RESTful Web Services" with the following specification scope: 

Jakarta RESTful Web Services defines a standard for development of web services following the Representational State Transfer (REST) architectural pattern.

Eclipse Project for JSON Processing will be renamed "Jakarta JSON Processing" with the following specification scope:

Jakarta JSON Processing defines a Java(R) based framework for parsing, generating, transforming, and querying JSON documents.

Eclipse Project for JAF will be renamed "Jakarta Activation" with the following specification scope:

Jakarta Activation defines a set of standard services to: determine the MIME type of an arbitrary piece of data; encapsulate access to it; discover the operations available on it; and instantiate the appropriate bean to perform the operation(s).

Eclipse Project for JPA will be renamed "Jakarta Persistence" with the following specification scope:

Jakarta Persistence defines a standard for management of persistence and object/relational mapping in Java(R) environments. 

Eclipse Project for WebSocket will be renamed "Jakarta WebSocket" with the following scope:

Jakarta WebSocket defines how Jakarta based applications create and manage WebSocket Clients and Servers.

I hereby request that the Specification Committee vote to approve the conversion
as described above of these existing projects into Specification Projects
under the supervision of the Jakarta EE Working Group.

Please respond to this note with:
+1 to approve;
-1 to reject; or
0 to abstain.

If you do choose to reject or abstain,
I would appreciate a short (one or two sentence) explanation.

I will interpret a single vote as applying
to all of the listed projects. You may also vote for each project individually
(if, for example, you'd like to register different votes for each projects).

I will document the results of this vote
on a per-project basis.

Thanks,

Wayne
--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc._______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee