Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Options for Jakarta EE 9

The feedback here is that we should *not* decide anything about the future,
but just describe options (which is what I tried to do in my message).
But the conversation in the meeting today seemed to be all about *deciding*
things, in particular what to require about compatibility.

So I'm unclear on what you guys want.

Present options with no decisions?

Present decisions for some things and options for some other things?


Mike Milinkovich wrote on 4/17/19 7:32 AM:
> On 2019-04-17 10:24 a.m., Scott Stark wrote:
>> We are going to have to explain the situation and then come up with
>> some ideas that are put out for community feedback. This is not
>> something we can decide on without users feedback as the move forward
>> is both source binary incompatible.
> Exactly. What we discussed and decided at the steering committee is that we want
> to show that there are go forward options being discussed, but make it clear
> that no decisions have been made.
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee


Back to the top