Tanja Obradovic wrote on 4/15/19 9:20 AM:
Per JESP v1.0: Specification Projects must engage in at least one Progress or Release Review per year while in active development
I believe this is incorrect. The EFSP says:
For both Major and Minor Releases the
Specification Team must engage in at least one successful Progress
Review and a successful Release
Review.
That's "and", not "or".
It's not clear to me that combining a Progress
Review and a Release Review is what the EDP intended, or that the
EFSP intended to allow combining them into a single review, but it
seems clear that the EFSP requires both, not a single review. If
the intent is that both reviews would occur, but would occur
(effectively) in parallel, we should make that clear. If the
intent is that a Progress Review is not required if the Release
Review occurs less than a year after the Creation Review, we
should update the EFSP.
I'm not opposed to any of these, I just want to make it clear
what's allowed and what's intended.
|
