Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] MicroProfile TCK Process

[Richard Monson-Haefel <rmonson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Given that the MP has not planned to adopt the EFSP,  I wonder if Microprofile should move to a new host?  It might be the best solution for all.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 8:40 AM Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2018-12-19 12:36 p.m., Scott Stark wrote:

We should be looking at elements of the MicroProfile process that seems to work and attempt to accommodate the possibility of MicroProfile using a future EFSP, but I'm not convinced that it is a requirement, and potentially not even possible.

Scott, et al,

I guess I was being too subtle in my previous email on this thread. In our opinion, simply maintaining the status quo is not an option. Adoption of the EFSP by MicroProfile is a question of when, not if.

The existing specification process and licensing regime for MicroProfile is causing the Eclipse Foundation serious concerns. We do not feel that the status quo is an acceptable long term scenario. This is the result of both the success in the industry that the specifications are achieving, and what we have learned as an institution as we created the EFSP.

Happy to explain more details on a call.

--

Mike Milinkovich

Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

@mmilinkov

+1.613.220.3223 (m)

---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee

--

Richard Monson-Haefel

https://twitter.com/rmonson

https://www.tomitribe.com/