Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Feedback on JNoSQL proposal

[Richard Monson-Haefel <rmonson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think it was required that every Working Group member have a committer or representative on every project.  Obviously, the more the better but if your organization doesn't have expertise or interest in the spec, why put resources on it?

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've heard from several people that it's not clear from the proposal that this is special "Specification Project".  Yes, you can read the description and get that idea.  But, since the Specification Projects have a slightly different process, we should somehow indicate that these are different from a normal EDP Project.

And, we've talked in our Committee meetings that each Working Group member should have a participant on each Specification Project.  (Sorry, can't remember if that was a requirement or just a suggestion.)  But, looking at the initial committer list on the Project Proposal, I don't see anyone signed up except for Tomitribe.  I am in the process of lining up one or two members from IBM.  But, since this is a Specification Project, do we need to poll the Working Group members to get an initial committer before this is ready for a Creation Review?

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Java EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee