[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Specification Committee call agenda, October 3/2018
|
Wayne Beaton wrote on 10/03/2018 07:56 PM:
> My apologies if I came across a bit frustrated today. My Internet connection
> was flaky all morning, making it very challenging to participate in the
> discussion.
I thought you were amazingly patient with the internet today!
> Here's what I took away from our call...
>
> We agreed that at some point it will be desirable to refactor the EE4J project
> to create a Top Level Project specifically for Specification Projects related
> to Jakarta EE.
No, we didn't agree on that.
We agreed that at some point we should discuss it.
In my opinion, that point would be after we've produced a few releases and
discovered the problems, if any, with the current project structure.
>
> We discussed the nature of the meaning of a Specification Committee vote. This
> discussion was started by my assertion that a Specification Committee owned
> the overall "vision" for how the various Specification Projects hang together.
> My best summary of the discussion is that the Specification Process is silent
> on the matter and that individual committee members determine their own
> criteria for voting (at a minimum, with each vote committee members need to
> agree that the Specification Project followed the process).
It might be good to have a FAQ entry suggesting the sorts of things a Spec
Committee member is likely to consider when voting. The list doesn't need to be
exhaustive or constraining.
