| Hi Daniel,
Yes, it makes perfect sense to me to nominate Ege AFTER the playground project has been moved to Eclipse as you can then clearly show that he has contributed valuable stuff to Eclipse. Until then, nobody knows whether his contribution will indeed end up at Eclipse and thus there is imho no ground for a nomination as of now.
Regards, Kai
P.S.: I have retired from the IoT PMC (so don’t take the above as an official PMC statement), but I'm happy to finish any discussions that I’ve started ;-)
Kai, Thank you for your feedback. Please let me state *why* we think Ege should be elected as thingweb committer also. As mentioned before, Ege is the main driver behind the TD playground [1] which becomes a more and more important aspect of the WoT specification and the thingweb project. Having said that, we plan to move the playground project into the Eclipse space (e.g., https://github.com/eclipse/thingweb.playground/) also, similarly as we did with the other parts. Does this make sense? Thanks, -- Daniel [1] https://github.com/thingweb/thingweb-playground> Matthias, > > Has Ege been actively engaged in the Eclipse project itself so far? This does not become > clear to me from your nomination.
> As pointed out in the other nomination, it would be great if you could provide some urls that
_______________________________________________ iot-pmc mailing list iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
|
