| Re: [interceptors-dev] [cdi-dev] Staged Interceptors 2.1.0-RC1 |
It looks good, but I can't approve it as I'm not a committer on interceptors. I added Dmtry, Andrew Pielage, and Ed as requested reviewers to see if one of them can approve the PR.
On Nov 23, 2021 at 4:27:24 PM, Emily Jiang via interceptors-dev <interceptors-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Further to today's Jakarta weekly call, there was an agreement to revert the Java 11 compilation level update. I have created this PR. Scott or someone else, can you review it and confirm this is the state we want to perform service release at? Once I have got an approval for this PR, I will merge in and kick off a Jenkins build for 2.0.1-RC1 and push to maven central for tests.ThanksEmilyOn Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:23 PM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Tracy was correct that there was no new version of Jakarta Interceptor spec. However, I saw the java compilation version was updated to 11 under this PR, which does require a minor change. That change will need to be backed out then before we can cut a service release candidate 2.0.1-RC1. By the way, the final release depends on Jakarta Annotations final release, so it can't be done as yet.ThanksEmilyOn Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:08 PM Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:_______________________________________________Ah yes, this was supposed to be a 2.0.1 service release. Please re-release a new version with that number. A 2.1 release would require a release plan.
On Nov 17, 2021 at 10:05:20 AM, Tracy Burroughs via interceptors-dev <interceptors-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Wait.... I didn't think there was supposed to be a new version of the Interceptors specification for Jakarta EE 10, so shouldn't this be 2.0.1 instead of 2.1.0? And since 2.0 is also for Jakarta EE 9, doesn't that mean it MUST remain compatible with Java 8? I thought all the specification that were not creating a new spec version for Jakarta EE 10 were to have a new x.0.1 version that included a module-info.java, but otherwise continued to compile and support Java 8
If there will be an Interceptors 2.1, then that complicates things for Jakarta EE 10 and specifically Jakarta Enterprise Beans, which will not have a new spec version, and which has a dependency on Interceptors 2.0. This would mean that Jakarta EE 10 must support both Interceptors 2.1 and 2.0 at the same time.
Also, a Interceptors 2.1 release plan would need to be created and added to the overall Jakarta 10 release plan, which I believe would then require other specs with dependencies on it to do the same, such as Enterprise Beans (which is not currently planning a new revision)
-- Tracy Burroughs (tkb@xxxxxxxxxx)
-- WebSphere Application Server Development
-- IBM Rochester, Dept WG8A H315/050-2
-- 2800 37th Street NW, Rochester MN 55901-4441
From: "arjan tijms" <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "interceptors developer discussions" <interceptors-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "cdi developer discussions" <cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11/16/2021 02:10 PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [interceptors-dev] Staged Interceptors 2.1.0-RC1
Sent by: "interceptors-dev" <interceptors-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi, I just staged Interceptors 2.1.0-RC1 here: https://jakarta.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/staging/jakarta/interceptor/jakarta.interceptor-api/2.1.0-RC1/For Interceptors we don't have many changes, but the Jakarta Annotations ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is >From an External SenderThis message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi,
I just staged Interceptors 2.1.0-RC1 here:
https://jakarta.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/staging/jakarta/interceptor/jakarta.interceptor-api/2.1.0-RC1/
For Interceptors we don't have many changes, but the Jakarta Annotations dependency changed to 2.1, and the minimum Java version to 11. A module-info.java was also added.
I didn't push it to Maven Central yet, awaiting some feedback on this.
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms _______________________________________________
interceptors-dev mailing list
interceptors-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/interceptors-dev
_______________________________________________
interceptors-dev mailing list
interceptors-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/interceptors-dev
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
--Thanks
Emily
--Thanks
Emily_______________________________________________
interceptors-dev mailing list
interceptors-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/interceptors-dev