In order to establish merit, a developer must establish
a pattern of providing high-quality contributions to the
project. We need more to go on than this one commit.
Has this commit been pushed into the corresponding
eclipse.org
repository? I can find no evidence of it. Which leads me to
the next important question: how can this be? There is clear
evidence of activity in the
eclipse.org repositories, so
some changes are making in there. But apparently not all.
Wayne
On 12/20/2011 10:19 AM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 19 Dec 2011, at 20:52, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Hey Hudson folks.
The election of Lucas Panjer cannot be approved
until suitable merit is established in a transparent
manner.
The initial nomination notice [1] went out on Dec
2/2011 with only "Initial contributor from Task
top." as the nomination criteria. My concern about
the nomination criteria, sent out a note on Dec
10/2011 [2], has not received a response.
FWIW, I did try to dig into this myself; I see no
evidence of any prior participation by Lucas in any
of Bugzilla, IPZilla, or in the project's IP Log.
Hi Wayne,
Just FYI, digging into the github/svn history I did
find the following commit by Lucas to Hudson core from
last November:
--
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
hudson-dev mailing list
hudson-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hudson-dev
_______________________________________________
hudson-dev mailing list
hudson-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hudson-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
