Re: [glassfish-dev] Cutting a GlassFish RC1

[arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

There's a few PRs to be merged. Shall we have these merged first?

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:58 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Scott.

 

I’ll start the process. We can always cuts an RC2 if small changes are needed before we do final.

 

Steve

 

From: Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 30 March 2021 14:30
To: glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>; jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [glassfish-dev] Cutting a GlassFish RC1

 

Hi,

+1 for cutting a public RC1 for Jakarta 9.1 release purposes.

I think the remaining TCK changes expected (EJB + Signature test library, doc) are not expected to cause GlassFish to see any TCK test regressions. When we have the TCK changes completed in a few weeks for Jakarta EE 9.1, we will want to run TCK testing again before we actually merge the changes in, to ensure that the TCK tests have not been broken by changes made.

Scott

On 3/30/21 8:58 AM, Steve Millidge (Payara) wrote:

 

Hi,

 

Has GlassFIsh 6.1 now successfully passed the web profile and full profile CTS? I’m looking at Jakarta EE 9.1 TCK results · eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck Wiki (github.com) and trying to interpret the results.

 

Should I kick off cutting a public RC1 for Jakarta 9.1 release purposes?

 

Thanks

 

Steve

 

 

_______________________________________________

glassfish-dev mailing list

glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev

_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev