Excellent, I would like to see that file
too. Thank you all very much for the information. 
 
Regards,
Diego.
 
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Haumer
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:35
AM
To: Eclipse Process Framework
Project Developers List
Cc: Eclipse Process Framework
Project Developers List; epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] Software
Development Metrics
 
 
Thanks a lot Greg. This is very interesting. 
Nate,
you need an OMG member id as this is only an initial submission. I will send
you the file directly. 
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
______________________________________________________________
PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________ 
 
  | 
   "Nate Oster"
  <noster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
  Sent
  by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
  04/26/2007 19:09  
  
   
    | 
     Please
    respond to 
    Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
     | 
    
   
   
   | 
  
  
   
    | 
     To 
     | 
    
     "Eclipse Process Framework Project
    Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
     | 
    
   
    | 
     cc 
     | 
    
       
     | 
    
   
    | 
     Subject 
     | 
    
     RE: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics 
     | 
    
   
    
  
   
   | 
 
Dr. Sullivan, 
  
There seems to be password protection on the link. 
  
Thanks, 
Nate Oster 
  
 
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sullivan, Gregory (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:06 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics 
  
You
might look at the Software Metrics Meta-Model (SMM) from the Architecture Driven
Modernization (ADM) task force of the OMG: 
http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/Software_Metrics_Metamodel_RFP.html
 
All
documents available from adm.omg.org 
 
--Greg
--
Gregory T. Sullivan, Ph.D.
BAE Systems Advanced Information Technologies
6 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
 MA 01803
(781)262-4553
gregory.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Haumer
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:33 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Cc: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List;
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics 
  
No, it was just not in scope, yet.  Any suggestions are very welcome.
In SPEM 2.0 we modeled Metrics as Describable Elements (i.e. documentation)
that also own a list of formal UML Infrastructure Value Specifications, which
is what we currently planning of implementing. 
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
______________________________________________________________
PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________ 
 
  | 
   "Pamio, Diego"
  <diego.pamio@xxxxxxxxx>  
  Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
  04/24/2007
  19:09  
    
  
   
    | 
     Please respond
    to 
    Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List      
     <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
     | 
    
   
   
   | 
  
     
  
   
    | 
     To 
     | 
    
     "Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers
    List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
     | 
    
   
    | 
     cc 
     | 
    
        
     | 
    
   
    | 
     Subject 
     | 
    
     [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics 
     | 
    
   
   
     
    
  
   
   | 
 
Did anyone tried to model process & product metrics method elements with
EPF? How is the best way to do it? I know this seems just not to be an
[epf-“DEV”] question, but mi concern is that the
“metrics” world has been considered or just that when designing the
epf-composer, a better solution to handle the metrics problematic was found,
like, for instance, a combination of tasks, guidelines, terms definitions,
roles and workproducts (that is, roles for metrics collection and reporting
responsibles, guidelines for metrics computation, terms definitions for
formulae, workproducts for source data and tasks to glue everything).
 
Which are your experiences on the topic? 
 
Regards, 
Diego N. Pamio 
asdc 
Argentina Software 
Development Center 
Intel Software de Arg. 
++54 351 414 5571 
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev