You might look at the Software Metrics
Meta-Model (SMM) from the Architecture Driven Modernization (ADM) task force of
the OMG:
http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/Software_Metrics_Metamodel_RFP.html
 
All documents available from adm.omg.org
 
--Greg
--
Gregory T. Sullivan, Ph.D.
BAE Systems Advanced Information Technologies
6 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
 MA 01803
(781)262-4553
gregory.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Haumer
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007
9:33 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework
Project Developers List
Cc: Eclipse Process Framework
Project Developers List; epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Software
Development Metrics
 
 
No, it was just not in scope, yet.  Any
suggestions are very welcome. 
In
SPEM 2.0 we modeled Metrics as Describable Elements (i.e. documentation) that
also own a list of formal UML Infrastructure Value Specifications, which is
what we currently planning of implementing. 
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
______________________________________________________________
PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________ 
 
  | 
   "Pamio, Diego"
  <diego.pamio@xxxxxxxxx>  
  Sent
  by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
  04/24/2007 19:09  
  
   
    | 
     Please
    respond to 
    Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
     | 
    
   
   
   | 
  
  
   
    | 
     To 
     | 
    
     "Eclipse Process Framework Project
    Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
     | 
    
   
    | 
     cc 
     | 
    
       
     | 
    
   
    | 
     Subject 
     | 
    
     [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics 
     | 
    
   
    
  
   
   | 
 
Did anyone tried to model process & product
metrics method elements with EPF? How is the best way to do it? I know this
seems just not to be an [epf-“DEV”] question, but mi concern is
that the “metrics” world has been considered or just that when
designing the epf-composer, a better solution to handle the metrics problematic
was found, like, for instance, a combination of tasks, guidelines, terms
definitions, roles and workproducts (that is, roles for metrics collection and
reporting responsibles, guidelines for metrics computation, terms definitions
for formulae, workproducts for source data and tasks to glue everything).
  
Which are your experiences on the topic? 
  
Regards, 
Diego N.
Pamio 
asdc
Argentina Software 
Development Center 
Intel
Software de Arg. 
++54
351 414 5571 
 _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev